I don't know what to say about your first "sentence". It makes zero sense. Putting up a disclaimer is a perfectly legit way to establish plausible deniability.
Name one thing she lied about or learn what the word "dishonest" means.
I'm not sure where the disconnect is on the first sentence, I think it's pretty clear I'm pointing out some bias. The person she decided to correct wasn't even the instigator.
It seems like you might have a poor grasp of the English language. You might know what you were trying to say, but it's not at all clear to me. There are at least 7 gramatical errors depending on what you were trying to type. "insinuate behind" is a nonsense coupling of words. "'open to being wrong' doesn't make broad-stroke [not stroking] connections" what? You never finished that clause.
You said she (Drey?) is being dishonest. How? What, specifically, did she lie about? Give me a quote where she said something false.
Of course the author is bias. That doesn't make anything she said a lie.
Also you're acting condescending while conflating 2 individual points I've made to be the same but questioning my grasp on the English language?
I said she was bias towards the person she was calling out, dip shit. Spend more time trying to comprehend a comment before going full neck beard.
Intellectual dishonesty is when you build a narrative on a foundational piece of evidence that was incorrect. If you're curious what that is, read the thread you're replying in.
The idea that I have to give you every single piece of context to the conversation that's ongoing for you to be able to decipher what I'm saying is moronic. If you want to prance around acting condescending, how about amass some authentic intelligence instead of this neck beard regurgitation?
I don't know what to say about your first "sentence". It makes zero sense. Putting up a disclaimer is a perfectly legit way to establish plausible deniability.
Name one thing she lied about or learn what the word "dishonest" means.
All of that is available above in the thread.
I'm not sure where the disconnect is on the first sentence, I think it's pretty clear I'm pointing out some bias. The person she decided to correct wasn't even the instigator.
It seems like you might have a poor grasp of the English language. You might know what you were trying to say, but it's not at all clear to me. There are at least 7 gramatical errors depending on what you were trying to type. "insinuate behind" is a nonsense coupling of words. "'open to being wrong' doesn't make broad-stroke [not stroking] connections" what? You never finished that clause.
You said she (Drey?) is being dishonest. How? What, specifically, did she lie about? Give me a quote where she said something false.
Of course the author is bias. That doesn't make anything she said a lie.
Friend, you're also being intellectually dishonest & playing the same kind of games.
You're being a weirdo & I don't care to humor it.
Giving real aCkShAlLy energy here.
Also you're acting condescending while conflating 2 individual points I've made to be the same but questioning my grasp on the English language?
I said she was bias towards the person she was calling out, dip shit. Spend more time trying to comprehend a comment before going full neck beard.
Intellectual dishonesty is when you build a narrative on a foundational piece of evidence that was incorrect. If you're curious what that is, read the thread you're replying in.
The idea that I have to give you every single piece of context to the conversation that's ongoing for you to be able to decipher what I'm saying is moronic. If you want to prance around acting condescending, how about amass some authentic intelligence instead of this neck beard regurgitation?
You're shit at this