This investigative work is incredibly importnt right now. The parallels you've drawn between government contracts, facility locations, and timelines deserve serious scrutiny. While some commenters debate the NIR connection, the broader pattern of moving detainees near Neuralink trial sites is deeply concerning. History shows us that vulnerable populations often become test subjects when oversight is weak. Your methodology and sourcing are transparent, which is exactly what investigative journalism should be. Keep following these threads.
They're all a nothing burger. Literally, it collapses at the very first connection, so maybe just don't take information based on a lie & start treating it as true?
What is y'all's obsession with profiles here lol. I just made an account and commented.
Nonetheless you don't have to trust me on anything, I'm not making any claims. The "evidence" displayed is false, objectively. You can come to the same conclusion by looking for it it. When you do you'll probably want to convince yourself that you're somehow in a position to use intuition to fill the gaps, but that's called delusion.
This investigative work is incredibly importnt right now. The parallels you've drawn between government contracts, facility locations, and timelines deserve serious scrutiny. While some commenters debate the NIR connection, the broader pattern of moving detainees near Neuralink trial sites is deeply concerning. History shows us that vulnerable populations often become test subjects when oversight is weak. Your methodology and sourcing are transparent, which is exactly what investigative journalism should be. Keep following these threads.
They're all a nothing burger. Literally, it collapses at the very first connection, so maybe just don't take information based on a lie & start treating it as true?
Your profile is a nothing burger but we're just supposed to accept your “trust me bruh” as fact? Hypocritical at best
What is y'all's obsession with profiles here lol. I just made an account and commented.
Nonetheless you don't have to trust me on anything, I'm not making any claims. The "evidence" displayed is false, objectively. You can come to the same conclusion by looking for it it. When you do you'll probably want to convince yourself that you're somehow in a position to use intuition to fill the gaps, but that's called delusion.